Klaas de Jager
Back to overview

MSD Haarlem · Technical Operations · Internship 2022/2023

What capacity
really costs.

Internship in my third year at MSD (Merck Sharp & Dohme) in Haarlem, in Technical Operations: a GMP environment where vaccines and medicines are packaged. My assignment was to make people, projects and capacity visible, and with it the cost attached to them. Every planning choice in a Capex portfolio is ultimately a choice about money.

Period

Terms 3 & 4 Academic year 2022/2023

Department

TechOps Pharmaceutical Technical Operations

Portfolio

30 to 35 projects Parallel GMP Capex projects

Angle

FTE and budget Own capacity versus contractors

Packaging lines that have to keep running while you improve them.

TechOps keeps the packaging lines, utilities and installations available for production and improves them through GMP Capex projects. Every project has to fit into the plant without disrupting operations, and within the budget released for it. If you do not have a sharp view of how people are deployed, you cannot see where that budget leaks away either.

Substantiation

Making hours traceable

Collecting project information and making the deployment per project traceable, so that a Capex request rests on actual figures instead of an estimate.

Staffing

Own people before contractors

Project managers, engineers, qualification engineers and TFS all have their own deadlines. Showing where internal capacity still has room and where it genuinely runs out turns hiring contractors into a substantiated choice rather than a reflex under time pressure.

Priority

What delay is allowed to cost

Built reporting that lets managers see where the load is full, where there is room, and which project can wait without the bill returning somewhere else.

What I learned here.

  • Capex and GMP

    How an investment decision relates to quality, safety and supply reliability, and what downtime on a packaging line means for the business case behind it.

  • The cost of capacity

    Set up FTE logic that converts hours into deployment per team, making visible when internal people are full and hiring contractors is genuinely necessary.

  • Weighing up systems

    Compared ONEPMO, Monday.com and Excel on cost, ease of use and overview, and substantiated that comparison towards management.

  • From problem to design

    DMADV as the structure from problem definition to functional design, supported by SWOT, MoSCoW, swimlane diagrams and RACI.

  • Figures as argument

    Reducing conflicting wishes from engineers, project managers and management to a single design, with the planning as the shared source in the conversation about priority and budget.